Thanks rvdborgt, for taking the effort to list your feedback and sharing it with us. It has been passed on to the relevant teams. We will get back to you soon. Cheers, 

Hi rvdborgt, 

Hereby the feedback on the points you made:
 

1. We have an FAQ about the internet requirement where we mention the rule to be online at least every 3 days. We assume that you are referring to the FAQ “Do I need an internet connection to use the Rail Planner App?” – we indeed don’t make a mention of it there. We can consider that, although the information can be found in another FAQ: '’Do I need an internet connection to use the Railplanner app?'’
    

   

    

2. We are aware of performance issues when not connected to the internet, although it’s the first time we’re hearing of 30 minutes, that’s indeed way too long. We’ve added some improvements in the last month, so the performance should have gotten a bit better and we’re including another improvement in the coming 21.0.0 release. But, it’s indeed still an issue that we’re continuously looking into. Unfortunately, it had to do with the way the app was set up in the beginning, so it’s quite a complex thing to solve.
    
3. We are not aware of the app doing this, Our App Team tried to reproduce it on their devices but for them the My Trip doesn’t scroll automatically. Could you perhaps provide a video of it? 
    
4. To mark the journeys on the map we use coordinates of the stations. And, indeed for journeys that are entered manually we have no way, at the moment, to collect those coordinates. It’s something on the backlog that we’d like to improve in the future, but we have no fixed timelines for this yet.
    
5. This needs to be checked. It has been added to the backlog as tasks. I will update you on the outcome once completed. 
   Added: Has been fixed in November
    
6. This needs to be checked. It has been added to the backlog as tasks.I will update you on the outcome once completed. 
   Added: Has been fixed in November
    
7. This needs to be checked. It has been added to the backlog as tasks. I will update you on the outcome once completed. 
   Added: Has been fixed in November
    
8. Such reductions are considered Pass benefits. As explained on the page you do not need to use a travel day, if you make use of discounted Pass benefits. In case of both the paper and mobile Pass, you do not have to add the journey. You only need to show you have a Eurail/ Interrail Pass on location. It is not a workaround but it is the way it is and always has been. However, good you are pointing out it is not clear to users. We acknowledge that the pass benefit rule may not be known by everyone and can lead to lost travel days. We will look into ways to make it clearer. 
    
9. This needs to be checked. It has been added to the backlog as tasks. I will update you on the outcome once completed. 
    
10. The local name is indeed missing. In this case, we would have to add local station names for each station. We've decided for now to use the English names which in general are easily recognizable for most people. We do have a few local names in the planner already. We will look into what is required to make it possible, and perhaps only of the most well known stations. 
    Added: This is being worked on at the moment with our timetable provider. 
     
11. This needs to be checked. We will look into this to see how other timetables handle this. At this point we don’t have plans to do anything in this area but we will consider to have it as an improvement point in the future. It has been added to the backlog as tasks. I will update you if we decide to make changes there.  
    Added: this has been tested and both Dutch and French names come up. Both names are used in the timetable. If you do see cases only showing the name in French, do let me know (and provide a screenshot)
     
12. We will look into this. At this point we don't have plans to do anything in this area, but we will consider to have it as an improvement point in the future. 
     
13. Technically, journeys cannot overlap. If a train is missed or travel plans change last minute it should still be possible to delete a journey and add a new one (also if that journey is already in the past).
     
14. We are using a supplier who takes the data from merits but has his own logic in transfer times. So they can indeed differ from the transfer time the carriers handle themselves. In the web timetable you are able to select your own transfer times. For the app we show connections with a transfer time of 5 minutes and more by default. On the one hand we want to display all connections as shown in the operators' own planners, but we received a lot of feedback from customers that showing journeys with a 2 or 3 minute transfer time is quite deceiving. In most (larger) stations less than 5 minutes is not enough time to make the transfer (especially if you are not familiar with the station). But because we displayed those connections in the planner, users believe it's doable and until they find out that they needed more time and missed connections with reservations attached to them. Therefore, we decided to keep the default at 5 minutes. It is still possible for the user to change the transfer time in the '’Options'’ of the planner to anywhere between 1 minute and 3 hours.

Thanks again for sharing your valuable feedback with us, rvdborgt. We will keep you posted.

Cheers, 

I was now busy traveling on my 2 month mobile pass. 

I liked the app and it works good. But I also had problems showing the ticket when there was no or bad internet. 

Again today (so I assume on the newest version, it did take at least 5 minutes) 

This is very bad for the traveler and also for the person that wants to check the ticket. 

Thanks for taking the time to share your feedback with us, Vero69. I'm glad to hear you enjoyed using the App . We do understand your concerns with regards to not being able to show your ticket so we will take it along when making improvements to the app. 

I do not have a pass yet but I am planing to go mid April this year. I get a bit worried concerning the problems with showing the ticket/pass off-line. Is it possible to take a screen-shot and show as an emergency solution?

 

Hi Robert, no need to worry. There are only a few exceptional cases for which the Pass was not showing. Due to fraud sensitivity it is not possible to show a screenshot. Once your Pass is on your device, you can find it any time in My Pass. If you have problems showing your ticket with QR during your trip, train staff will be be able to check the details on your Pass manually to check validity. Always make sure to get in touch with our Customer Support via this form, as they can assist you as well. But as mentioned, almost all travelers do not experience issues with showing their ticket offline. 
If you have more concerns/questions you can have a look at our Mobile Pass FAQ or post it here. 

Thanks Nanja, now lets hope the pandemic slows down so I can go mid April. 

Any progress on this item yet @Nanja ?

I’m reasonably hopeful Trenitalia-TPER ought to be included; all the other Trenitalia subsidiaries are.

They run a summer-only cross-country route from Pesaro to Bergamo via Rimini, Ravenna, Ferrara and Brescia called the Freccia Orobica, which I suspect would be very useful for some travellers.

Many thanks!

Hi Edm, thanks for checking in. Basically there is no Tper trains data in the database of the European Timetable and that's the reason we don't get them in our timetable. Our reservation specialist has been following up with them for feedback on these regional carriers in Italy and if they can pick it up with Trenitalia directly, but there is no result yet. Will keep you posted. 

Regarding the other points we would look into:

• Point 5,6 and 7, has been fixed in November. 
• Point 10, this is being worked on still with our timetable provider. 

• Point 11, this has been tested and both Dutch and French names come up. Both names are used in the timetable. If you do see cases only showing the name in French, do let me know (and provide a screenshot)
  
  Note: I will add it in the overview above, to have everything together. 

Point 11: that's easy. Dutch and French names are indeed recognised when you enter them in the planner. Here two names in Dutch:

However, when looking at the details in the planner, they become French, here for the first train in the screenshot above:

And they stay French when I add them to my trip:

However, in Switzerland, many exonyms are recognised but the station names as used locally are used in the planner results and My Trip. You can request a journey from Genf to Bale Sbb:

But if you open one of the results, the station names are correctly changed to their local forms:

In My Trip, the local names are also used:

It should be possible to use the method for the Swiss stations for all other countries.

My phone has a Dutch UI but that shouldn't make a difference.

It is not related to phone settings indeed. Here's how it works. The names user can enter and see in search field indeed have aliases and other languages. That's why you can find more options. The names in the journey results (and when adding to Trip) are fixed as to how they are provided in the database. Our timetable data provider is using some aliases for searching, but the train details are shown as originally coming from the source: UIC Merits data. I don't think this is something we can change, but we will double check it with the provider. 

Interesting. I'd be very surprised if Belgian railways use only French names in their MERITS data, also for stations in the regions where French is not spoken (e.g. Louvain instead of Leuven). As to Prague, I'd also be very surprised if the MERITS data used "Prague” instead of "Praha”.

In any case, all other timetable planners I know show in the journey results station names in the language of the region (e.g. Leuven and Praha in DB, ÖBB etc. planners), which is the only correct way from the passenger's point of view.

Well that is a fair point. We looked into it again and when we in UIC merits we type Leuven the result is Louvain. And yes, it has both languages available, but one is leading. This works great for planners use translations, but it seems that our timetable provider does not. The reason why it looks the way it does is due to the fact that the journey in Merits comes with the main languages., even though a station itself has translations.

So in summary, The stations in UIC Merits are provided in French. While the synonyms exist and can be used for searching purposes, the station itself as part of the journey is only displayed in the original format, which is seen as the name of the station. Our timetable provider cannot do anything about this, unfortunately. It’s rather a question to UIC why the station is provided in French rather than Dutch.

As for Prague, the behaviour is odd, because in UIC Merits the name is Praha without any synonyms. Our reservation specialist will look into it further. 

So… after all, it seems that Belgian railways are providing incorrect leading station names? I suppose the leading name can be set per station, as the Swiss examples seem to be showing? If that is the case, then Belgian railways should be asked, I think, to correct their MERITS data, so passengers are shown the correct names and they won't be confused by names that can't be found anywhere at the station.

Thanks for the research. I've learned a few interesting things :)

In a way - while certainly not great - this isn’t surprising of Belgium.

Officially their state railway company is bilingual, but for English language users they market both their domestic and international apps as SNCB. I’d assume SNCB/NMBS is based in the capital city; again, officially bilingual but just as Nanja said of the railway naming convention, French is clearly leading there, and by a significant margin.

The Flemish still get very touchy around any implied preference given to French, and in a way that isn’t surprising because of the historical context. Even in the high middle ages before the Dutch Revolt, there was a clear dividing line in the Low Countries at the Waal-Maas delta, south of which (Flanders and Brabant) the nobility and magnates were French speaking and more closely tied to the (also French-speaking) Burgundian seat of power in Brussels - even if most of the common people in both places were Dutch-speaking. After the Belgian Revolution in 1830 this situation basically resumed, and French was given favourable treatment well into the 20th century, with the modern linguistic border only being legally established in the 1960s.

Make no mistake, bilingualism is well-implemented in Belgium today, such that both sides should feel they are treated fairly in general, but there’s still the odd quirk like the technical timetabling one discovered here, where French will be given precedence.

But it’s not one that is ever likely to bother most Belgians, because they’ll probably never discover it - belgiantrain.be and b-europe.com both render station names in the correct local form at the point of purchase.

Indeed. They even do so in German, although they're legally obliged to use the official German name and abbreviation...

Any update on 3. please?

It’s taking at least 15 seconds to scroll for me.